More people worldwide are dying from obesity-related causes than ever before, a new study indicates.
Obesity-Related Deaths Hit New High Worldwide
Diana PhillipsJune 12, 2017
Very emotional and very alarming article. But really, say me, how it was found that obesity led to death? Very important point, is heart disease lead to obesity and fatality, or it is obesity lead to heart disease?
I try to find out, how it was found that it is obesity led to mortality, and I did not find it in article with so pretentious title. In stead it was something more interesting, and really I did not get the author's point:"The mix of increased prevalence and decreased mortality leads to more years spent with obesity and more time for the damaging coexisting illnesses, such as type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, to develop."So, if I live longer then I have to be unhappy because of it is more years of my life with diabetes type 2 and disability? Really, I still not able to get what author try to pretend to say.
Of particular concern to the editorialists is the near-tripling of obesity rates seen in children and young adults in developing, middle-income countries, such as China, Brazil, and Indonesia.Everyone talking about diabetes, no one care what they do talking about. diabetes is not the problem right now. There is insulin which can prevent amputations and most complications. Insulin will lead to the development a new generation without diabetes ether type of it. But today every one, child or adult , must be treated without abuse, mocking, and ridiculing our appearance, but with respect and care. With so many talks about human rights protection, there is no one protection for people with disability, diabetics type 2. We presented that we are diabetics type 2 because of we obese. really? What if we obese because of we are not diagnosed and wrongly treated diabetics type 2?
"An early onset of obesity is likely to translate into a high cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease," they write. "An increased incidence of diabetes among children may shift a proportionately greater load of morbidity into middle age and spread the burden of chronic disease more fully across the entire age distribution, even as populations continue to age."
Today diagnose diabetes is easy. At least there is no any special screening in need. Simple, make sugar level vital, the same as BP and temperature of the body. When one has elevated temperature of body one will have anti-biotics as first line of treatment. In contrary, if one has blood sugar level 599 then one will have Life Style Modifications as treatment regime. Elder;ly woman sent out of clinic to home with her home aid with blood sugar 700 mg/dl. She was given shot of insulin in clinic, first time ion her life, and she got into low blood sugar. So, she did not get home, She returned to clinic.
Now say me, what is the ADA recommendations how to diagnose diabetes, type of diabetes, and stages of it? How to start treatment, and how to continue it? It is easy to say that if blood sugar is over 200 mg/dl it is diabetes, so diabetes can be diagnosed. What if blood sugar 700 mg/dl.? ADA does not provide any recommendations how our clinic practitioners must address to diabetic of this type.
"An early onset of obesity is likely to translate into a high cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease," they write. "An increased incidence of diabetes among children may shift a proportionately greater load of morbidity into middle age and spread the burden of chronic disease more fully across the entire age distribution, even as populations continue to age."OK, what is now? The population continue to age, still population will die anyway in one age or another, right? Then what is authors all of them talking about? It was time when population died because on malnutrition. This was when BMI formula was created, to assess population, not individuals.
1800 - 1850 life expectancy was 37 years.
1850 - 1900 live expectancy was 40 years.
1900 - 1950 48 years.
1950 - 2000 67 years.
2000 - 2050 74 years.
So, if my diabetic father died at age of 37, then I am happy to live with diabetes to the age of 65 + by now. I am OK to be disable, have all that complications usually presented as greatest load. I live my life, and I love the way I do live.
To add more years even if it is disability and limited mobility mean for me more opera to listen, more camps to go, more quilts to make, more life to enjoy. SO, what all those
This study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The study authors have no relevant financial relationships. Dr Shaw reports receiving personal fees from Novo Nordisk.
really talking about? About diabetes that we are diabetics because of our obesity? Not at all. Just give us Insulin in stead of Invokana and Metformin, and there would be happy years of healthy life style and no any modifications needed. Just provide medical treatment in stead of social abuse and discrimination, mocking and LOLing. Do not take picture of me from behind. Take a look at the pictures places I visited, mountains I climbed.
All these pictures I took, and I had been there. I simple do not like to anyone abuse me how obese I am. This is not business of anyone. When talking about death obesity lead just show me, how it was determined that death caused by obesity? If it is heart attack and person was obese and this was the obesity related death then it is really time to take a look at the authors, what brain development they do have? Or they do so skinny that there is no matter to develop any mental ability? So, they are simple vegetables, brain - death personalities. Shame of you! At least say something more interesting then repeat all what already was told many times by you and every one else.
via Ravenvoron
No comments:
Post a Comment