There are many different tests to diagnose diabetes. ......
Why there are so many tests? Simple. They are all not reliable. No one of them show the real condition of insulin secretion. All tests looking to level of sugar in blood or urine. No one test run to diagnose the condition of pancreas, or Beta insulin secreting cells. So, regardless of the number if tests, the diagnose of diabetes is wrong. Diabetes is not the level of sugar in blood which is all the time different, but the level of insulin secretion. This test never run.
Most used test to diagnose diabetes is Glucose Tolerance Test.
Well, when this test would be run? There are people in rick group to became diabetics or to be diabetics. Test run, and they are on the border line of diabetes development, still they are not diabetics yet. At the same time millions of diabetic live with diabetes, fully established, fully developed stage of diabetes, and glucose tolerance test never run to test if they are diabetics of not. Why? They are not obese. They are not in group of risk. No one of them has treatment till diabetes get into final stage, close to the fatal level of sugar in blood. Probably at that time diagnose would made. Not every time. Many diabetics die without ever being diagnosed being diabetics. Stroke. Heart attacks. Lung complications.
In best way, patient come to clinic, blood sugar tested and then Rx to Glucose tolerance test ordered. Patient come to clinic fasting. Here glucose would be given to patient. And then test for level of sugar in blood would be taken 30 mn, 60 min, and so on. Something like that. Now the question is, why this test given? What this test accomplished? Nothing.
It is assumed that sugar rise after glucose loading. It is, but is this highest rise in blood sugar after loading with glucose? How many of us eat glucose? No one. We eat normal meal, fat, protein, and carbohydrates, but never pure glucose. Glucose tolerance test what suppose to show?
In nondiabetic sugar level return to normal two hours after 100Gr glucose loading.
What happened in diabetic? Test is differ in different clinics. Test is differ if glucose given or protein driven. Test is expensive but not clear picture of diabetes.
What effect to the test results?
Improper feeding prior the test.
Obesity.
Infection.
Bed rest before the test.
and so so on. Is test reliable? What this test accomplished? What test show? What test diagnosed? Nothing.
Results of the test run differently with difference in age. ????? If age effect to result then why test run in first place the same as for little one and for old one?
Interpretation of test results.
This is what about? MD see the result is normal with different number on glucose meter? Really what is this about? Now diagnose of diabetes can be effected by one who provide diagnose? I think that all above has no any value if diagnose of test depend on one who interpreter the test results. There is no one test really needed. What test for?
As I said, there is no one need in test.
The result of testing, millions of diabetic live without being diagnosed with diabetes, having treatment for potentially fatal disease, and die from simple infection or any other conditions, 100% treatable. All those 70, 000 lives lose every year due to diabetes 100&% preventable.
100 years after insulin discovery American Medicine still Barbarian. Victims treated with life style Modifications as it was 100 years before, and most effective treatment still Starvation Diet.
Why there are so many tests? Simple. They are all not reliable. No one of them show the real condition of insulin secretion. All tests looking to level of sugar in blood or urine. No one test run to diagnose the condition of pancreas, or Beta insulin secreting cells. So, regardless of the number if tests, the diagnose of diabetes is wrong. Diabetes is not the level of sugar in blood which is all the time different, but the level of insulin secretion. This test never run.
Most used test to diagnose diabetes is Glucose Tolerance Test.
Well, when this test would be run? There are people in rick group to became diabetics or to be diabetics. Test run, and they are on the border line of diabetes development, still they are not diabetics yet. At the same time millions of diabetic live with diabetes, fully established, fully developed stage of diabetes, and glucose tolerance test never run to test if they are diabetics of not. Why? They are not obese. They are not in group of risk. No one of them has treatment till diabetes get into final stage, close to the fatal level of sugar in blood. Probably at that time diagnose would made. Not every time. Many diabetics die without ever being diagnosed being diabetics. Stroke. Heart attacks. Lung complications.
In best way, patient come to clinic, blood sugar tested and then Rx to Glucose tolerance test ordered. Patient come to clinic fasting. Here glucose would be given to patient. And then test for level of sugar in blood would be taken 30 mn, 60 min, and so on. Something like that. Now the question is, why this test given? What this test accomplished? Nothing.
It is assumed that sugar rise after glucose loading. It is, but is this highest rise in blood sugar after loading with glucose? How many of us eat glucose? No one. We eat normal meal, fat, protein, and carbohydrates, but never pure glucose. Glucose tolerance test what suppose to show?
In nondiabetic sugar level return to normal two hours after 100Gr glucose loading.
What happened in diabetic? Test is differ in different clinics. Test is differ if glucose given or protein driven. Test is expensive but not clear picture of diabetes.
What effect to the test results?
Improper feeding prior the test.
Obesity.
Infection.
Bed rest before the test.
and so so on. Is test reliable? What this test accomplished? What test show? What test diagnosed? Nothing.
Results of the test run differently with difference in age. ????? If age effect to result then why test run in first place the same as for little one and for old one?
Interpretation of test results.
This is what about? MD see the result is normal with different number on glucose meter? Really what is this about? Now diagnose of diabetes can be effected by one who provide diagnose? I think that all above has no any value if diagnose of test depend on one who interpreter the test results. There is no one test really needed. What test for?
As I said, there is no one need in test.
The result of testing, millions of diabetic live without being diagnosed with diabetes, having treatment for potentially fatal disease, and die from simple infection or any other conditions, 100% treatable. All those 70, 000 lives lose every year due to diabetes 100&% preventable.
100 years after insulin discovery American Medicine still Barbarian. Victims treated with life style Modifications as it was 100 years before, and most effective treatment still Starvation Diet.
via Ravenvoron
No comments:
Post a Comment