ads

Tuesday, 19 February 2019

Diabetes Type 2 Cause and Development. Post 3. Frbruary 18, 2019

Classification of Diabetes.
       In present time classification of diabetes present diabetes as type 1, diagnosed usually in young people, type 2 diagnosed in adults, LADA diagnosed adults without obesity, and diabetes in pregnancy. If classification is wrong then diagnostic will be wrong, so do treatment will be wrong. Now, with the fact that 95% of diabetic population are diabetics type 2, type of diabetes developed as the result of overweight and obesity, then it is easy to see the confusion in classification. Maybe it is time to a new diabetes classification, regarding on medical state rather then weight f the body?
      There are well known classification in medical treatment for all sociological states of human development. It is infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, geriatric stage of human grow. In every stage of it the medical treatment and disease development are different. No one pretend to treat infant in the same way as it is senior. Even they do have the same decease such as TB or diabetes, or flu, the treatment will be different. The same we can say about development of disease. It is fast riding in infants, and slow developed in adults. What is fatal for infant will not kill adult.
      It is the same rule for development of diabetes. In some patient diabetes developed in late stage of life, in senior years. In other patient diabetes developed in childhood. The same as some infants born diabetics. The treatment cannot be the same. So, the classification of diabetes, if it is type 1, type 2, type 1.5, or any other types it would be, wrong.
"Occasionally some infants suffer from hypoglycemia following protein intake. This has been shown to be +due to the absorbed leucine, to which the beta cells of these infants are sensitive."  (page118)
     What MD doing in this case? Low sugar is very danger, for infant it can be fatal. Low sugar lead to bran damage. Treated wrongly, infant can be destroyed right before mother took baby on her hands. In some hospitals infant's pancreas would be removed. This is barbarism in diabetes education to medical providers. It is sound stupid and that it is my fantasy. It is not, sad to say so. With open mind it is easy to see the same barbarism in treatment of millions of adult with diabetes type 2. What is idea that diabetes type 2 may be reversed with starvation diet? Is this scientific study, or primitive barbarism? It is not my fantasy. It is ADA recommendations.
       The same I can say about pre-diabetes. Really, what does it mean? One is not diabetic yet, but one will be if one will not lose weight. What are the scientific studies behind this? What are evidence that this patient is not diabetic? No one. One is already diabetic, was born diabetic. If proper examination of kidney, eyes, plasma blood, and many other tests would be run, it will sow that diabetes was before any diagnose was made. If so then say me, how proper diet can fix pancreas abnormalities? What are those abnormalities? No one understanding in the cause of diabetes.
      It is understandable. Medicine is not the fantasy, and it cannot be in front of human industrial development. The problem is not with demand to answer to the question which today has no answer. The problem is in the understanding the place of medical profession and where these providers stand. Every one of them know very well, diabetes was not caused by obesity. If so then why it is so hardly pushed to blame ill people that all what they have is caused by their laziness and careless? It is not. We were born diabetics. Diabetes abnormality is in our genetic.
        OK, today it is not possible to diagnose diabetes according to genetic diagnostic. Still, it is possible to treat diabetes effectively in present time and avoid millions of unnecessary death, pain, amputations, suicides, you name the rest.     


via Ravenvoron

No comments:

Post a Comment