Diabetes is poor metabolism of carbs. Something like that. So, how did it diagnosed? Simple. Because of it is poor metabolism of carbs diagnose of diabetes based on test how blood sugar rise after intake of 75g of glucose. So, to diagnose diabetes one must come fasting to the diagnostic center and sugar level would be taken. Then it would be 75g of glucose, and then every 30 min level of sugar will be taken. Probably plasma glucose to increase the price of test. Two hours later last blood would be taken, and diagnose would be made. Simple. Is it accurate?
It is hypothesis that diabetes is intolerant glucose metabolism. To check if theory right or wrong it is simple to take another test. At first fasting blood sugar taken. Then full meal eaten. No one of us take glucose as meal. The matter of fact, glucose is not nutrition. In energy drinks sugar is abundant. Does it give energy one need? No. It give crush. So, why it is glucose load taken to diagnose diabetes? Take simple meal, protein, fats, and carbs as it suppose to be on healthy plate, and then check sugar level. This level of sugar must be taken as long aas it is going up, and then going down. This is really test for diabetes.
We all do know very well that after meal level of sugar in blood rising. Because of diabetics do have elevated level of sugar it is pretended that diabetics take Sweet to replace nutrition, healthy life style recommendations. At the same time it never tested how sugar going up with healthy life style recommendations. So, it is suggestion. In stead to take glucose load, take normal dinner, normal meal, as plate with proteins, fats and carbs, and take readings. In some people readings go up and then one hour later return down to normal level. In diabetics these readings are different. Sugar may go up up to 5 hours, and then drop down to the low reading less then withing one hour.
Studies like that never presented or published to the public. Why? The same as for today level of sugar in blood still not vital. If sugar would be vital then many perfectly fit individuals would be diagnosed with diabetes. End of common believe that diabetes caused by obesity. The same I can say about GTT. If in stead of glucose load the full meal of nutrition would be taken then it would be seen that it is not glucose that diabetic's blood sugar lift up, but any healthy meal. Why?
Diabetes is not elevated level of sugar. It is symptom of diabetes. But the condition is abnormally low insulin secretion and low insulin storage capacity. Simple, if there is no insulin then there is no way to tolerate any meal, healthy or not, glucose of any nutrition, protein, fat , or carb.
It is hypothesis that diabetes is intolerant glucose metabolism. To check if theory right or wrong it is simple to take another test. At first fasting blood sugar taken. Then full meal eaten. No one of us take glucose as meal. The matter of fact, glucose is not nutrition. In energy drinks sugar is abundant. Does it give energy one need? No. It give crush. So, why it is glucose load taken to diagnose diabetes? Take simple meal, protein, fats, and carbs as it suppose to be on healthy plate, and then check sugar level. This level of sugar must be taken as long aas it is going up, and then going down. This is really test for diabetes.
We all do know very well that after meal level of sugar in blood rising. Because of diabetics do have elevated level of sugar it is pretended that diabetics take Sweet to replace nutrition, healthy life style recommendations. At the same time it never tested how sugar going up with healthy life style recommendations. So, it is suggestion. In stead to take glucose load, take normal dinner, normal meal, as plate with proteins, fats and carbs, and take readings. In some people readings go up and then one hour later return down to normal level. In diabetics these readings are different. Sugar may go up up to 5 hours, and then drop down to the low reading less then withing one hour.
Studies like that never presented or published to the public. Why? The same as for today level of sugar in blood still not vital. If sugar would be vital then many perfectly fit individuals would be diagnosed with diabetes. End of common believe that diabetes caused by obesity. The same I can say about GTT. If in stead of glucose load the full meal of nutrition would be taken then it would be seen that it is not glucose that diabetic's blood sugar lift up, but any healthy meal. Why?
Diabetes is not elevated level of sugar. It is symptom of diabetes. But the condition is abnormally low insulin secretion and low insulin storage capacity. Simple, if there is no insulin then there is no way to tolerate any meal, healthy or not, glucose of any nutrition, protein, fat , or carb.
via Ravenvoron
No comments:
Post a Comment