New Your Times Quack-Quack Opinion Statement. December 23, 2016

A diversity of medical opinion is not a bad thing; in fact, far from it. Today’s fringe treatments could well become tomorrow’s standard protocol. http://ift.tt/1GJpt5E

Dr. Oz Is No Wizard, but No Quack, Either

This is NY Times opinion in response to attacks on Dr. Oz. What does it mean? This means, forget about medical treatments outcome. Doctor has opinion, and doctor has right to have his own opinion how to treat patient. Patient has no one opinion. Medical Care sees us as Rats for their labs.  If patient died as a ressult of the treaatmnet, it is in no one way doctor's fault. It is just because of patient did not survive, and doctor has right to experiment with another one. 

This is Statement New York Times brought to the readers. Dr. Oz has own opinion, and it is not bad things. 

Still, I do have my own opinion, and I do not think it is bad thing ether, regardless what New Your Times see it is right or wrong. I do have my Standards Protocol.

 When doctor use his medical opinion, it is no longer 'HIS OPINION'. This is the core difference between New Your Times opinion and my Standards Opinion. Doctor has Conduct Protocol, and he must follow this Protocol, or stop to use title Doctor, Dr. MD. So, when Dr. M.Oz step on the high stage,who is he, Doctor? Quacker? Nether? Both? 

Every doctor has a diversity opinion, what to eat better to prevent diabetes, blueberries or apples? how many miles to walk to reverse diabetes type 2 which already took its toll and one leg is already amputated? and how many times diabetic type 2 must spend in fitness club after resent stroke or heart attack? They still argue, and we are ding. In NYC where Dr. Oz practice Diabetes is number 4 cause of Death. Diabetes, high blood sugar level, 100% preventable cause of Death with right insulin therapy. There is no one standard protocol how to use insulin. It is diversity of Medical Opinion, diabetics type 2 do not need insulin added in injections, but many other add-on such as Invokana or green coffee beans can successfully reverse diabetes type 2.

That BMJ study, for example: When researchers analyzed 80 “randomly selected” recommendations from “The Dr. Oz Show,” they judged that 26 of them, or 33 percent, were supported by evidence they deemed “believable.” They found just nine recommendations that were contradicted by convincing scientific literature. Looked at this way, Dr. Oz is proved wrong only 11 percent of the time — not ideal but hardly “egregious.” The BMJ authors also didn’t list the statements they examined and the evidence for or against, so it’s hard to know how serious these errors might have been.

Quack-Quack-Quack investigation, proudly presented by New Your Times to support Dr.Oz innocence. Take a close look at the numbers, how author effectively manipulate by them.
26 recommendations.
9 were proved to be wrong at that time
authors did not release statements they examined this means, according to NY Times, it is not known how serious these errors. might have been.  Great I would say. WOuld they ever find what is wrong with Dr. Oz recommendations? Never. Because they investigate what did he already stopped to recommend. To any investigations he may say, sorry, I changed my mind. It was wrong recommendation. But who is 100% right, right? And there story go on and on and on. All are happy. Dr. Oz collect high money. Investigators keep high job. Diabetics die bulled and mocked right from every corner on every TV.
Still, according to my Standard Opinion, it is right opposit, how relable all 26 recommendations can be in first place. Just take a look at the recommendations, and NY Times present it right here:

Much of what Dr. Oz talks about is pretty anodyne stuff: Eat fruit! Exercise! Sleep right! Diet features prominently on every show:

So, NY Times is right, there is no one evidence that these recommendations are wrong. What I am very happy that author did not present his problems with bowel movements at the time of show. The half of his article devoted to his personality, how great and cool he is. In my time we used to say, "Shortness is Mather of Talent ... but Stepmother of Money". Really, author get paid by every word published, so then more words then more money deposited on account.

The doctors’ letter raises an interesting question: Is “evidence-based medicine” itself always a settled issue? In scientific inquiry, the “truth” is slipperier and more fluid than distinguished physicians will generally admit. Different doctors take different approaches to issues like whether or not to prescribe statin drugs to patients with high cholesterol, or how to treat people with pre-diabetes.

Let us take a look at this 'true'. What are the evidence to scientific inquiry? In my Standards Opinion, if I do not get worse, but getting better, it is evidence that insulin Lantus Solo Star is medicine I need. When I take Metformin I do have poison effect, very severe, and my cholesterol level fly over sky. There is no choice but take statin drug, Lipitor only, never generic, it does not work. If I do not take Lipitor  then I do have severe heart palpation and very high heart rate.

Now about “evidence-based medicine. What are the evidence that Metformin and life style modifications can prevent diabetes, or reverse diabetes, or control high blood sugar numbers? There is no one. Diabetes is number 7 cause of Death in America. It is number 4 cause of Death in NYC. It is only diabetes, high blood sugar. There are more all cause mortality to diabetes. Stroke and heart attacks due to clotting blood result of untreated diabetes. Painkillers leading to overdose or overuse because of pain due to diabetes is not bearable. Lung complications because of our blood is poor in oxygen. You name it, we do get it all. So, why today it is diet and work out crucial treatment options? My evidence show it in different way. Rx insulin, find right treatment regime with insulin therapy, and there are no Quack - Quack doctors needed anymore to teach what pose to use for proper bowel movements to reverse Diabetes type 2.

 Some are quick to prescribe medications, whereas Dr. Oz tends to favor less interventionist, more natural approaches based on diet and exercise.

According to New Your Times it is hard to be wrong with this approaching. In my Standard Opinion, it is illegal to put ill people in danger of bulling and mocking. This approach must be stopped! But really, who is going to do so? Dr. Oz? New York Times? Columbia University? They are all spoon from this approach. All and every one.  The result is, when diabetic type 2 enter in any clinic the Rx is diet and exercise. Does not matter what is the medical condition, what is the issue with health, diet and exercise cannot get wrong.
According to the author, every doctor has diversity opinion. According to my investigation, they all do have the same, BMI standards created back to 1850 when human population paid high toll to Consumption, old name for TB. People who were ding from Consumption were underweight, and this was the formula in attempt to prevent high mortality. All diversity in doctor's opinion is how many grapes patient must eat every day, or patient should not eat grapes at all, but eat garlic and drink  Red Wine. No Smoke. They all agree in this approach.

Here in America, rightly or wrongly, we have clearly chosen a wild and woolly marketplace where free speech comes before regulation and expert ruling. That means that, as patients and consumers, we need to do our own homework and exercise another precious right: the right to a second opinion. And then, maybe, a third.

Sorry, New Your Times.  This is what wrong with Medical Opinion. I do not have any rights. I am diabetic type 2. I am Patient. I do have no one authority to have my own opinion. If doctor said it is good for me, then in opinion of my health plan company, or any other administrative organization, it is what is really is. Regardless if it is good for me or it can be fatal for me, I have to follow doctor's order.  So, if it is ADA Standard Protocol that diabetics type 2 first line treatment is life style modifications then does not matter how my ill pancreas declined in ability to secret insulin, I would be denied insulin and treated with Junk Medicine such as Invokana or Bulling Therapy such as life style modifications. Of cause I can go from one clinic to another or even third, and then they all call to each other and support opinion of initial sender. It is Ethic Standards. There is no second opinion possible.

via Ravenvoron