Sugar is 114 mg/dl.I take almost 500 units of insulin, and still sugar in blood higher then I wish. I wish it is under 100, better to be around 80 mg/dl, and it is not. It is 114 mg/dl. My A1c is already good, as good as many non diabetics do not have. It is about 4%, a little bit higher. So, why sugar still not stable and still go up?
Yesterday another book from Amazon was delivered.
Early Diabetes
edited by Rafael A. Camrrini-Davalos and Harold S. Cole.
Academic Press. 1970
The book based on The International Symposium on Early Diabetes
Now I do have a question. I have a few books based on the International Symposiums and different other conferences addressing to study diabetes. What is in common with all of them? They study what diabetes, if it is environmental or inhered? What cause diabetes? and so so so on. There is no one study which I crossed so far, how effectively treat diabetes.
It can be seem that I am wrong. In every book in past or present there are some chapters how to treat diabetes. Yes, that's right. Still, there is no Academic Studies, how effective any diabetes therapy. In all medical articles it is taken for granted that diabetes is progressive. In present time it is widely presented that diabetes may be reversed. Academic Studies are not the done to present any case of diabetes progression or reverse.
Let me be more clear and specific.
In theory diabetes classified as type 1 and type 2, Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. So, in diagnose there are must be clear differentiation how diagnose diabetes type. There is no any marks to be used how to diagnose type of diabetes. Even more then that, it is still unclear how to diagnose diabetes. Diagnose of diabetes come too late. In many cases it is not only symptoms already surfaced but severe complications such as gangrene, blindness, MI, stroke, COPD, and so on.
Diagnose diabetes type 2 based on body size. Because of adult diabetics usually obese, the hypothesis was established that it is obesity which caused diabetes type 2. But if we will take early diagnostic of diabetes to the big surprise of public many lean and perfectly fit individuals will have diabetes long before diagnose was done. So, the question is, what was first and what followed up? There is no one prove that diabetes type 2 cause is obesity.
As I said above, why all Symposiums developed to study the cause of diabetes? And After we found what caused diabetes what is the next step? Treatment I suppose. The matter of fact, regardless if today in Academic Studies it is still under discussion what caused diabetes, there are millions of diabetics who are treated for diabetes ether type of it. Why there are no published Academic Studies how treatment for diabetes effective or not?
In past publications treatment with Insulin was the part of study. In present time there are all medicine to treat diabetes type 2, but no one medicine compared with Insulin. Why? Insulin for diabetics type 2 is out or medical discussions, out of diabetic's type 2 medical box. Still, when insulin is part of diabetic's type 2 treatment regime, diabetic live and complications of diabetes developed later, if they do.
In my studies, diabetes type 2 is not progressive but can be treated effectively with insulin. 10 years on SU and Metfrormin bring me to non fatal stroke, MI, and blood sugar above limits of glucose meter. With right dose of insulin my sugar dropped down from A1c=9.4% down to non diabetes level. No one oral anti-diabetes agents work so effectively as it is done by Lantus Solo Star. With dose of insulin about 500 units daily I still our of fatally danger hypoglycemia. The matter of fact, my blood sugar is just perfect.
Yesterday another book from Amazon was delivered.
Early Diabetes
edited by Rafael A. Camrrini-Davalos and Harold S. Cole.
Academic Press. 1970
The book based on The International Symposium on Early Diabetes
Now I do have a question. I have a few books based on the International Symposiums and different other conferences addressing to study diabetes. What is in common with all of them? They study what diabetes, if it is environmental or inhered? What cause diabetes? and so so so on. There is no one study which I crossed so far, how effectively treat diabetes.
It can be seem that I am wrong. In every book in past or present there are some chapters how to treat diabetes. Yes, that's right. Still, there is no Academic Studies, how effective any diabetes therapy. In all medical articles it is taken for granted that diabetes is progressive. In present time it is widely presented that diabetes may be reversed. Academic Studies are not the done to present any case of diabetes progression or reverse.
Let me be more clear and specific.
In theory diabetes classified as type 1 and type 2, Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. So, in diagnose there are must be clear differentiation how diagnose diabetes type. There is no any marks to be used how to diagnose type of diabetes. Even more then that, it is still unclear how to diagnose diabetes. Diagnose of diabetes come too late. In many cases it is not only symptoms already surfaced but severe complications such as gangrene, blindness, MI, stroke, COPD, and so on.
Diagnose diabetes type 2 based on body size. Because of adult diabetics usually obese, the hypothesis was established that it is obesity which caused diabetes type 2. But if we will take early diagnostic of diabetes to the big surprise of public many lean and perfectly fit individuals will have diabetes long before diagnose was done. So, the question is, what was first and what followed up? There is no one prove that diabetes type 2 cause is obesity.
As I said above, why all Symposiums developed to study the cause of diabetes? And After we found what caused diabetes what is the next step? Treatment I suppose. The matter of fact, regardless if today in Academic Studies it is still under discussion what caused diabetes, there are millions of diabetics who are treated for diabetes ether type of it. Why there are no published Academic Studies how treatment for diabetes effective or not?
In past publications treatment with Insulin was the part of study. In present time there are all medicine to treat diabetes type 2, but no one medicine compared with Insulin. Why? Insulin for diabetics type 2 is out or medical discussions, out of diabetic's type 2 medical box. Still, when insulin is part of diabetic's type 2 treatment regime, diabetic live and complications of diabetes developed later, if they do.
In my studies, diabetes type 2 is not progressive but can be treated effectively with insulin. 10 years on SU and Metfrormin bring me to non fatal stroke, MI, and blood sugar above limits of glucose meter. With right dose of insulin my sugar dropped down from A1c=9.4% down to non diabetes level. No one oral anti-diabetes agents work so effectively as it is done by Lantus Solo Star. With dose of insulin about 500 units daily I still our of fatally danger hypoglycemia. The matter of fact, my blood sugar is just perfect.
via Ravenvoron
No comments:
Post a Comment