One in four patients in outpatient treatment settings suffer from breathlessness. Acute and chronic lung diseases are usually the main causes. Studies show that many people with interstitial lung disease (IDL) also suffer from type 2 diabetes. But do patients with type 2 diabetes also have a higher incidence of lung and respiratory diseases? Could breathlessness, IDL and RDL be a consequence of diabetes? These questions were investigated for the first time in a study by researchers from the German Centre for Diabetes Research (DZD) and the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL) at Heidelberg University Hospital.It is important, of cause, to know what is first and what is next. Why it is important? How this effect to the health and to the outcome? In all those studies the first rule of logic is broken: follow it does not mean the cause of it. So, if breathlessness, acute or chronic lung disease happened after diabetes type 2 diagnosed it does not mean that diabetes type 2 is course of it. I suggest better way to study: Is this really diabetics type 2 suffer this condition? What about diabetics type 1? Do adult diabetics type 1 suffer lung disease? Do non diabetics adult suffer lung disease?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180711105728.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fhealth_medicine%2Fdiabetes+%28Diabetes+News+--+ScienceDaily%29
Still, it is not the question for University Hospital studies. The question is why? What is the difference if some group of people suffer more then patients with other medical conditions? If it is not the rule of discrimination, to abuse one group of patients and treat another with the same medical condition? What Heidelberg University Hospital try to study, and how these studies suppose to work? To treat diabetics type 2 lung complications? To dismiss diabetics type 2 lung complications? What is the reason for the study?
Money, of cause. There is no one benefits in these studies, but money for the hospital. They pretend they do important work, and care for those who suffer in Heidelberg University Hospital under their care. At first they get money for the studies. Then they publish results of studies, no one ever will use because of the result is fake. Why it is fake? Because of any study can be done to support any result sturdier need. Simple.
What about diabetics type 2? What about those who suffer from lung complications? Really, who care? Then more them then more studies possible, more money available. Clear as crystal.
via Ravenvoron
No comments:
Post a Comment