People with prediabetes who go to bed later, eat meals later and are more active and alert later in the day -- those who have an 'evening preference' -- have higher body mass indices compared with people with prediabetes who do things earlier in the day, or exhibit morning preference.It is so nice and easy to say: have an 'evening preference'.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180815141422.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fhealth_medicine%2Fdiabetes+%28Diabetes+News+--+ScienceDaily%29
Now the question is, how many nurses, doctors, any med personal work at eve shift?
How many MTA staff work at night shift?
How many ..... any professions staff must work at night shift? Just count all those pro, and say, do they have an 'evening preference'? Not at all. It is our life style, all those who work. Some pro does not work at night. Many have to. It is not because of those pro wish to work at night shift. They simple have no other choice.
When it is said that pro who work at night shift will develop diabetes type 2, just remember, night shift is not healthy at all for anyone. It is not our nature to sleep at day time and be active at night time. Those shift leads to develop many medical conditions, high blood pressure and heart complications, vision decrease and Asthma attacks, and so so no, you name it, and it is true for any medical condition to be developed or to be developing.
So, what really studies about? What it was said that no one do not know and study needed to discovery it? Really nice question, is not it?
Prediabetes is a condition where blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not yet high enough to be Type 2 diabetes. Without modifications to diet and exercise, patients with prediabetes have a very high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.Very interesting expression. Patient already does have elevated level of sugaar in blood. No, it is still not good to be treated. Diabetic must develop into deeper hole before treatment will be started. Till that treatment is only one, life style modifications. How does it work? LOL! Look at the Mortality tables which published by CDC. Diabetes is number 7 cause of death in USA. In NYC it is number 4 cause of death. Really interesting. IN NYC there are medical clinic on every corner. So, why diabetes stand so high in mortality. Well, of cause, there are shops on every corner too, so every New Yorker stop by every shot and eatery before get to job, and after work day. Really, how people cannot develop diabetes type 2 if there is no hunger but food everywhere?
Well, if this theory is true then ... then all people on the street will be the same size and the same wide. It is not. Someone is wider, other perfectly fit. Why so? The theory that amount of eatery and food stand lead to develop higher obesity looks like being wrong. Also, if this is true then every eatery and every food stand will have line of customers. It is not. I was in Asian Buffet last weekend. "All you can eat". What is most important, there was no food on plates left. People took one trip after another to take different food. But after they finished this food, plates were clean, no left over. What is so important in this observation? People are intelligent being. They put on plate the amount of food they can eat, and do not put more then they needed. So, is this really true that people will stop over every eatery? Where is time for that?
The theory that diabetics type 2 done it for themselves is very well suitable for creating public opinion that society can do nothing to safe these lives and prevent suffering. Really, how MD or nurse can stop diabetic type 2 from eating? But what if this theory is wrong? What if there is not eating problem and diabetics type 2 do not need to modify lifestyle? What if MD Rx of diet and work out is wrong? What if this treatment kill rather then heal? At least it can be done by study to support this theory or prove it is wrong.
The diabetes epidemic in Guatemala is worse than previously thought: more than 25 percent of its indigenous people, who make up 60 percent of the population, suffer from type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes, suggests a new study.When we will take into consideration that diabetes type 2 developed long before it was diagnosed and long before A1c >7.5% then the number of diabetics type 2 in Guatemala will skyrocketing. So, why these people suffer from medical condition which considered to be priority of high developed societies with abandoned food choice?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180814101416.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fhealth_medicine%2Fdiabetes+%28Diabetes+News+--+ScienceDaily%29
"This alarming increase in both diabetes and pre-diabetes appears to be significantly related to aging, and not obesity or BMI (body mass index) -- a surprising finding that contradicts the traditional relationship we know between unhealthy weights and these diseases," said first author Kent D.W. Bream, MD, an assistant professor of Clinical Family Medicine and Community Health at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and the Center for Global Health. "While it remains unclear why such a disparity exists in this population, some studies have pointed to increased physical inactivity and insulin resistance as drivers of diabetes in the elderly."At least it is one step up to support the idea, BMI is not the way why diabetes type 2 developed. Now there is hope that one day someone will run studies and prove that there is no diabetes type 2 at all in first place. As soon as blood sugar started to elevate, simple start Insulin Therapy. If this diabetic will not recovery, then there is chance that next generation of these patient will not have diabetes type 2. The way to stop diabetes type 2 development. Simple, and possible to do today.
It is all the time presented that insulin leads to low sugar. If so then say me, why there are so many studies, so many diets developed to treat diabetics type 2, and still, there is no one study how use insulin in injections? Try to find it. If you do, please, post link here. I will be grateful.
The researchers found that age had a statistically significant association with type 2 diabetes, while BMI did not. Irrespective of BMI, an individual over 65 years old was more than 10 times more likely to have diabetes compared to individuals below the age of 40. Similarly, individuals 40 to 64 years old were more than five times more likely to have diabetes than individuals younger than 40.
via Ravenvoron
No comments:
Post a Comment