Let me give you the punch line up front: 69% of the treatments currently in human trials have been funded by JDRF. (And the number is 86% for the later phase trials.) This is a strong impact; one that any non-profit should be proud of. Below is a list of all the treatments, grouped by phase, and separated into groups that JDRF has funded, and those JDRF has never funded.
Established: One or more trials are open to people who have had type-1 diabetes for over a year.
Presymptomatics: One or more trials are open to people who have 2 or more autoantibodies, but have not yet started showing symptoms of type-1 diabetes.
Prevention: This treatment is aimed at preventing type-1 diabetes, not curing it.
The Difference Between Phase-II and Phase-II? Trials
Phase-II trials are "classic" phase-II trials; they are done after a successful Phase-I trial in type-1 diabetes. What I call Phase-II? trials are done on known safe treatments, so they don't need Phase-I trials, but have never been tested on type-1 diabetes before. These Phase-II? trials might be Phase-II from the point of view of size and safety, but they are Phase-I in terms of effectiveness, so I'm putting them in their own category.
Summary: currently there is only one treatment in a phase-III clinical trial, and that is aimed at prevention. It is funded by JDRF:
Summary: there are 22 trials in phase-II, and 18 of them have been funded by JDRF, while 4 have not. Here are the treatments that have been funded by JDRF:- Oral Insulin (Preventative)
- AAT (Alpha-1 Antitrypsin) by Kamada
- ATG and GCSF by Haller at University of Florida (Established)
- Abatacept by Orban at Joslin Diabetes Center
- Abatacept by Skyler at University of Miami (Prevention)
- Aldesleukin (Proleukin) at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Diamyd, Ibuprofen ("Advil"), and Vitamin D by Ludvigsson at Linköping University
- Diamyd, Etanercep, and Vitamin D by Ludvigsson at Linköping University
- Diamyd and Vitamin D by Larsson at Lund University (Prevention)
- Gleevec by Gitelman at UCSF
- Gluten Free Diet: Three Studies (Preventative)
- Polyclonal Tregs by both Trzonkowski and Gitelman
- Stem Cell Educator by Zhao (Established)
- Teplizumab (AbATE study team)
- Teplizumab by Herold/Skyler/Rafkin (Prevention)
- Tocilizumab by Greenbaum/Buckner at Benaroya Research Institute
- Umbilical Cord Blood Infusion by Haller at University of Florida
- Ustekinumab by University of British Columbia
- Verapamil by Shalev/Ovalle at University of Alabama at Birmingham
- ATG and autotransplant by Burt, and also Snarski, and also Li
- Dual Stem Cell by Tan at Fuzhou General Hospital
- Stem Cells of Arabia (Established)
- Vitamin D by Stephens at Nationwide Children's Hospital (Prevention)
Summary: there are 12 trials in phase-II, and 7 of them has been funded by JDRF, while 5 have not. Here are the treatments that have been funded by JDRF:
- Alpha Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) by DiMeglio
- GABA by Diamyd
- GNbAC1 by GeNeuro (Established)
- Golimumab by Janssen
- Golimumab by Greenbaum (Established)
- Intranasal Insulin by Harrison at Melbourne Health (Prevention)
- Rituximab by Pescovitz at Indiana University
- Albiglutide by GlaxoSmithKline
- Ladarixin by Emanuele Bosi of Dompé Farmaceutici
- Liraglutid (Presymptomatics)
- NNC0114-0006 and Liraglutide by Novo-Norsk
- Rapamycin Vildagliptin Combo by IRCCS (Established)
Summary: there are 24 trials in phase-I, and 15 of them are funded by JDRF, while 9 are not. Here is the list funded by JDRF:
- Alefacept by TrialNet
- ßAir by Beta-O2's at Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden (Established)
- TOL-3021 by Bayhill Therapeutics (Established)
- CGSF by Haller at University of Florida
- Exsulin and Ustekinumab by Rosenberg at Jewish General Hospital, Canada (Established)
- Golimumab by (Presymptomatics)
- IBC-VS01 by Orban at Joslin Diabetes Center
- Metformin by Littleford at The University of Exeter (Prevention)
- MonoPepT1De by Cardiff University
- Mozobil by University of Alberta (Established)
- MultiPepT1De (Multi Peptide Vaccine) by Powrie at King’s College London
- Nasal insulin by Harrison at Melbourne Health (Prevention)
- Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid (TUDCA) by Goland at Columbia University
- Pro insulin peptide by Dayan at Cardiff University
- VC-01 by Viacyte (Established)
- CGSF and autotransplant by Esmatjes at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Established)
- Encapsulated Islets at University clinical Hospital Saint-Luc (Established)
- Gluten Free Diet by Carlsson at Lund University
- IMCY-0098 by Imcyte
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell by Carlsson at Uppsala University
- Microvesicles (MVs) and Exosomes by Nassar at Sahel Teaching Hospital
- Monolayer Cellular Device (Established)
- ProTrans by NextCell (Established)
- Substance P by Vanilloid Genetics at Hospital for Sick Children Toronto (Established)
59 in total
41 funded by JDRF
So 69% of the human trials currently underway are funded (either directly or indirectly) by JDRF. Everyone who donates to JDRF should be proud of this huge impact; and everyone who works for JDRF or volunteers for it, should be doubly proud.
16 of these treatments (27%) are being tested on established type-1 diabetics.
Of these, 9 are funded by JDRF.
So 56% of the trials recruiting established type-1 diabetics are funded by JDRF.
Compared to Last Year
In 2017 there were 55 treatments in clinical trials, in 2018 there are 59 (growth of 7%).
In 2017 there was 1 treatment in Phase-III trials, in 2018 there is one (no change).
In 2017 there were 22 treatments in Phase-II trials, in 2018 there are 22 (no change).
In 2017 there were 8 treatments in Phase-II? trials, in 2018 there are 12 (growth of 50%).
In 2017 there were 24 treatments in Phase-I trials, in 2018 there are 24 (no change).
A Little Discussion
This year there are no phase-III trials aimed at curing type-1 diabetes, and that's been true for many years. Indeed, since I've tracked research, there has never been a phase-III trial aimed at people with established type-1. Back in the 2000s, there were a couple aimed at curing honeymoon type-1, but none were successful, and none have started for years.
That's discouraging, because it means we are a long way from a cure. However, for me, it's a reason to donate. Money is the thing that is going to move the Phase-II studies into Phase-III studies, and the Phase-I studies to Phase-II, create more Phase-I studies, and so on. And if we think "nothing looks promising in the next few years, so I won't give money" that results in nothing looking promising in the future, either. If you're worried about your money going to non-research, then you can do what I do: fill out the attached form or go to the following website and send it in with your donation: http://thejdca.org/good-giving-landing-page/ (Unfortunately I don't know how to do this for on-line donations.)
How I Count Trials for This Comparison
- I give an organization credit for funding a cure if it funded that cure at any point in it's development cycle.
- I mark the start of a research trial when the researchers start recruiting patients (and if there is any uncertainty, when the first patient is dosed). Some researchers talk about starting a trial when they submit the paper work, which is usually months earlier.
- If there are different clinical trials aimed at proving effectiveness as a cure and as a preventative, or effectiveness in honeymooners and established diabetics, then those are counted separately.
- For trials which use combinations of two or more different treatments, I give funding credit, if the organization in the past funded any component of a combination treatment, or if they are funding the current combined treatment. Also, I list experiments separately if they use at least one different drug.
- The ITN (Immune Tolerance Network) has JDRF as a major funder, so I count ITN as indirect JDRF funding.
- I have made no attempt to find out how much funding different organizations gave to different research. This would be next to impossible for long research programs, anyway.
- Funding of research is not my primary interest, so I don't spend a lot of time tracking down details in this area. I might be wrong on details.
- I use the term "US Gov" for all the different branches and organizations within the United States of America's federal government (so includes NIDDK, NIAID, NICHD, etc.)
- I don't work for the US Gov, JDRF, or any of the other organizations discussed here. I have a more complete non-conflict of interest statement on my web site.
- GNbAC1 by GeNeuro used JDRF's nPOD project.
- NextGen's ProTrans product is a form of Wharton's Jelly, and JDRF has funded related research into Wharton's Jelly, but has not funded this program specifically, so it is listed as non-JDRF.
- I'm removing Dr. Faustman's BCG research from my list of potential cures. For more information read this blog:
https://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2018/09/every-year-in-september-or-october-i.html and for even more details
https://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2018/07/dr-faustman-publishes-follow-on-bcg.html - Oral Insulin: This trial was a phase-III trial, meaning that it was large and designed to provide enough information so that if, if successful, the treatment could be widely used. However, as it turned out, only part was successful, and that part was phase-II sized, so I don't think we will see widespread use based on this trial alone. You can think of this as a phase-III trial with phase-II results.
- Serova's Cell Pouch and DRI's BioHub: These two clinical trials are both testing one piece of infrastructure which might be used later in a cure. They are testing a part of a potential cure. However, in both cases, the clinical trials being run now require immunosuppression for the rest of the patient's life, so I'm not counting them as testing a cure.
- Substance P at Hospital for Sick Children Toronto: This trial is avoiding the honeymoon period by testing for insulin production. Patients must inject more than 1/2 unit/kg to be accepted, therefore they will accept recently diagnosed people, if they are injecting enough insulin to be passed the honeymoon. I'm counting this as "Established".
- https://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2017/10/jdrf-funding-for-cure-2017.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2016/10/jdrf-funding-for-cure-2016.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2015/10/jdrf-funding-for-cure-2015.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2014/09/jdrf-funding-for-cure-2014.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2013/10/jdrf-funding-for-cure-2013.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2012/09/jdrf-funding-for-cure-2012.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2011/10/jdrf-funding-research-for-cure-2011.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2010/09/jdrf-funding-research-for-cure-2010.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2009/09/jdrf-funding-research-for-cure.html
- http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2008/10/jdrf-funding-of-cure-research-phases-ii.html
Please remember that my blog (and therefore this posting) covers research aimed at curing or preventing type-1 diabetes that is currently being tested in humans. There is a lot more research going on than is counted here.
Please think of this posting as being my personal "thank you" note to all the JDRF staff, volunteers, and everyone who donates money to research a cure for type-1 diabetes:Thank You!
Finally, if you see any mistakes or oversights in this posting, please tell me! There is a lot of information packed into this small posting, and I've made mistakes in the past. As in previous years, I'll be at the Santa Clara (California) JDRF One Walk. New this year, I'll be part of the Bigfoot Team. Come by and say "hi", or strike up a conversation about research. I love to talk about research!
https://ift.tt/2y5Z9G6
publicjoshualevy at gmail dot com
All the views expressed here are those of Joshua Levy, and nothing here is official JDRF, JDCA, or Bigfoot Biomedical news, views, policies or opinions. In my day job, I work in software for Bigfoot Biomedical. My daughter has type-1 diabetes and participates in clinical trials, which might be discussed here. My blog contains a more complete non-conflict of interest statement. Thanks to everyone who helps with the blog.
via Cure Research
No comments:
Post a Comment